 |
|
|
|
|
Vol
4: Issue No.11 : November, 2004 |
|
| Hony.
Editor |
| Dr.
Bindi Mehta
Professor
& Chairperson (Research & Publications)
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
(Deemed University) |
|
   
   
   
    |
|
| International
Events |
| Russian
companies have made little progress
in improving corporate governance
|
Russian
companies have made little progress
in improving corporate governance
in recent years due in part to a weak
judiciary and instability in ownership
rights aggravated by the Yukos affair,
the ratings agency Standard and Poor's
said Thursday.
"Little progress has been made
since 2002 to improve corporate governance
in Russia," Standard and Poor's
said in a study commissioned by the
Organisation for Economic Co-operation
and Development, the World Bank and
other partners.
An OECD/World Bank report released
in 2002 set out 40 recommendations
for improving corporate governance
in Russia. Of those, "no progress
was observed on 17, little progress
on 14, some progress on eight and
major progress on only one,"
Standard and Poor's said.
The report cited several reasons for
this.
"The role of the legislators,
the judiciary system, the regulatory
bodies and professional associations
in advancing the global standards
of corporate governance remains weak,"
it said.
The report added that the legal and
regulatory environment has not changed
substantially and remains a major
obstacle to the improvement of corporate
governance standards in Russia.
"This has been particularly aggravated
by the recent Yukos affair that has
severely undermined the stability
of ownership rights and the nascent
trust that had been developing between
businesses and the state."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| New
UK corporate governance law receive Royal Assent |
The
UK’s Companies (Audit, Investigations and Community Enterprise)
Bill has received Royal Assent and will help protect Britain
against Enron style corporate scandals - as well as creating
a new type of company specifically designed for social enterprises.
The act implements safeguards recommended by post-Enron/WorldCom
reviews. In particular it strengthens the independent regulation
of the audit profession and the enforcement of company accounting
requirements, both concerns highlighted by the Enron and
WorldCom scandals. It gives auditors greater powers to get
the information they need to do a proper job, and increases
company investigators' powers to uncover misconduct.
Trade and Industry Minister Jacqui Smith said:
"The UK has one of the best systems of corporate governance
in the world. This Act contributes to a comprehensive package
of measures aimed at strengthening investor confidence in
corporate governance, company accounting and auditing practices
here in Britain.
"This is another key milestone on the journey to create
the very best framework for thriving, competitive and responsible
businesses. There is still much to do.
"One of the next steps will be to introduce a new Operating
and Financial Review for quoted companies which will provide
investors with new and more meaningful information about
companies' business opportunities, risks and future prospects.
We then intend to publish for consultation draft clauses
implementing the wide-ranging Company Law Review, the biggest
overhaul of company law in a century.
"Together these measures will ensure that our system
of corporate law and governance reflects the reality and
needs of our modern economy."
The act will improve the reliability of financial reporting
and the independence of auditors and auditor regulation
by:
-
Requiring directors to make a statement in the directors'
report about the disclosure of relevant information to
their auditors;
-
Giving the Government the power to require large and quoted
companies to publish details of non-audit services provided
by their auditors;
-
Requiring the professional accountancy bodies that supervise
auditors to sign up to independent auditing standards,
monitoring and disciplinary procedures;
-
Strengthening the role of the Financial Reporting Review
Panel (FRRP) in enforcing good accounting and reporting,
by giving it new powers to require documents and broadening
its scope;
-
Allowing the Inland Revenue to pass information about
suspect accounts to the FRRP.
The
act also strengthens company investigations by:
-
Improving investigators' access to relevant information;
-
Reducing the possibility of delay or obstruction by companies
under investigation;
-
Removing a possible deterrent to individuals volunteering
information when complaints are vetted for possible investigation;
-
Introducing more effective sanctions.
|
| EC
draws up proposals to prevent another 'Parmalat' |
The European
Commission has proposed forcing companies to disclose all
financing done off the books as part of a four-point initiative
to prevent accounting scandals such as the recent bankruptcy
of Parmalat.
Under
the new rules, publicly traded companies would have to provide
full information about off-balance sheet arrangements, such
as securities sales made through trusts. Certain financial
instruments can involve special purpose entities located offshore
that are not captured in the balance sheet.
The proposal also wants to establish that board members are
collectively responsible for financial statements and key
non-financial information. and that unlisted companies’ transactions
with related parties should become more transparent.
Finally, the Commission proposes to make listed companies
issue an annual corporate governance statement. The proposals
are part of the Commission’s Company Law Action Plan, published
in May 2003.
The broad objective of this push towards tighter corporate
governance is to ease investor fears after major accounting
discrepancies at Parmalat, the Italian foodmaker and also
Dutch retailer Royal Ahold.
“Recent financial scandals show that investors and the public
need more protection against cheats,” said internal market
commissioner Frits Bolkestein. “Today's proposal will build
confidence in EU capital markets and reduce malpractice.”
Investigations into alleged fraud at Parmalat, which has food
operations around the world, began after the revelation in
December 2003 of a €3.95 billion hole in the company accounts.
Parmalat said it had the money temporarily marooned in the
Cayman Islands, since deemed by a US bank to be non-existent.
It was discovered that the Italian food giant, which had operations
on over 30 countries and employed over 35,000 staff, had used
special-purpose entities to keep debt off of the books or
make it look like equity.
At the end of the year the company was declared insolvent
with debts of over €14 billion and its founder and former
chief Calisto Tanzi arrested in a criminal probe into the
billions of euros of missing money.
In order to prevent this from ever happening again, the EC
proposals would establish that board members of limited companies
are collectively responsible for financial and other key information
that they publish. In addition, Member States must have appropriate
sanctions and liability rules where board members do not comply
with accounting rules.
For listed companies, disclosure requirements on transactions
with all related parties such as family members and company
managers already exist under International Accounting Standards
(IAS). The proposed amendments would extend these to unlisted
companies, though the amendments would apply only to significant
transactions with related parties not carried out under normal
commercial conditions.
Member States would be able to exempt small unlisted companies.
The Commission’s fundamental argument is that companies that
perform well tend to be well-governed. It argues that investors
need transparency on corporate governance to make informed
investment decisions.
But the Commission has its work cut out. According to a Bloomberg
news agency report, a survey conducted by consultant firm
Hallvarsson & Hallvarsson reveals that more than half
of Italy's biggest companies still don't give investors enough
financial information on their corporate Web sites.
If the commission's proposal, which needs approval by EU governments
and the European Parliament, is to achieve greater transparency
across the 25-nation bloc, then it must overhaul this culture
of sloppy corporate financial governance.
Go
to top
|
| HKSFC
urges companies to pay attention to corporate governance |
|
Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission
Chairman Andrew Sheng urged Hong Kong companies to pay enough
attention to the forms of corporate governance.
Speaking at the Hong Kong Institute of Company Secretaries'
Corporate Governance Conference 2004, Sheng said that good corporate
governance adds value to the company; bad corporate governance
subtracts value.
"Many Hong Kong companies are good at delivering value
and performance, but may not have paid enough attention to the
forms of corporate governance that is now demanded by global
investors of world-class companies." Sheng said.
According to Sheng, there are more than 58 percent of Hong Kong's
trading is dominated by institutional investors, and 39 percent
by overseas investors, these investors do care about the form
of corporate governance, i.e. compliance, as well as the substance,
which is performance.
"It is important that one major element of corporate governance
is not just about having an appropriate board structure and
culture, and internal control processes, but also about managing
a company's relationship with its stakeholders and providing
transparency about how it goes about delivering performance
through conformance." said Sheng.
Go
to top
|
|