| Hony.
Editor |
| Dr.
Bindi Mehta
Professor
& Chairperson (Research & Publications)
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
(Deemed University) |
|
|
| |
| |
|
Finance
ministry asks SEBI to speed up stock market reforms |
|
The finance ministry has asked the Securities and Exchange Board
of India (SEBI) to implement reform measures such as the corporatization
of stock exchanges, creation of the IndoNext trading platform
and conversion of clearing-houses into corporations on a priority
basis.
SEBI
is expected to fix a specific date for exchanges such as the Bombay
Stock Exchange (BSE) to submit fresh schemes for demutualisation
and corporatisation of these bourses. The maximum number of representatives
of stock brokers on the recognised stock exchanges’ the governing
board shall not exceed one-fourth of the total strength of the
governing board, the ordinance says. Demutualisation, which seeks
to segregate the ownership and management from the trading rights
of the members of a stock exchange, has been pending for the past
three years.
A
proposal is already pending with SEBI from the BSE and the Federation
of Indian Stock Exchanges (FISE), which represents the country’s
20 bourses, to from a national market called IndoNext on the lines
of Europe’s EuroNext. The government also wanted the markets regulator
to ensure that clearing houses of the stock exchanges be converted
into clearing corporations.
At
present, only the National Stock Exchange (NSE) has a clearing
corporation. Most other exchanges, including the BSE, have clearing
houses, which are entrusted with the task of clearing the trades
on exchanges and provide counter party guarantee for those trading
on exchanges.
Go
to top
|
Breach
of Companies Act may invite fine of up to Rs. 1 Crore |
| Getting
away with corporate offences may not be too easy any more. The
government has begun work to raise penalties for serious defaults
to over Rs.1. crore. Penalties proposed in the draft concept paper
on overhaul of the Companies Act are to be further revised, as
per a ministry of company affairs proposal. The concept paper
had proposed maximum penalties of Rs.10 lakh for serious offences
like failure to pay declared dividends, redeem debentures or pay
back deposits raised from investors.
In
its present form, the Companies Act provides for nominal penalties,
ranging from Rs.500 to Rs.5,000, which have failed to act as a
deterrent. Errant companies have been paying maximum fines upfront
for compounding of major offences. The ministry had placed the
concept paper aimed at simplifying the Act, in the public domain
for comments to be studied by an expert committee,
SEBI,
under a new ordinance issued by the government, now has powers
to penalise stock exchanges - such as slapping a fine of up to
Rs.25 crore - it bourses fail to comply with SEBI’s directions.
Till now, the only action SEBI could take against bourses for
non-compliance of its directions was de-recognising the bourse,
which is quite impractical.
Go
to top
|
Failure
to pay SEBI penalty may invite 10-yr. jail term |
The government has
just strengthened SEBI’s hands further by permitting the market
regulator to impose a fine of up to Rs. 25 Crore if bourses
do not follow its directions. The recently – issued Securities
Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2004, says that if a stock exchange
fails or neglects to furnish periodical returns to SEBI, or
fails to make or amend its rules or by-laws as directed by the
regulator, SEBI can slap a penalty of up to Rs. 25 crore.
Last year, the government
gave SEBI power to impose higher penalties, as part of its efforts
to help the market regulator act decisively against wrongdoers.
In addition to that, the government is now increasing SEBI’s
penal powers and expanding its scope.
The ordinance
also says that SEBI can slap a penalty of up to Rs. 25 crore
on companies that dematerialise more than the issued securities
or deliver in the stock exchanges securities that are not listed
or where no trading permission has been given by the stock exchange.
It adds that failure to pay the penalty imposed by SEBI could
lead to imprisonment for up to 10 years
Go
to top
|
CalPERS
gets going, pumps in $100m here |
The
California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS), the
largest pension fund in the US, has invested over US $100 million
in the domestic market since April 2004. The fund, which made
an entry into the country early this year, has made investments
in the pharma, manufacturing and IT sectors. It has also invested
another US $10-15 million by way of private equity investment.
“We have made over $100m investment in the Indian markets,”
said Priya Mathur, Vice Chairperson, investment committee trustee
CalPERS, who is currently in India. She did not comment on how
much more CalPERS is likely to bring into India this year. The
fund has invested close to US $ 2 billion in emerging markets
last year. “We have three emerging market fund managers who
make the investment decision. If they find an opportunity, they
will invest.”
“We are
looking at investing in local corporate debt if the market develops,
but it is an immature market right now,” she said. The daily
volumes in the Indian corporate debt market average about Rs.100
crore.
Go
to top
|
Local
audit firms may have to separate consultancy business |
All Indian
audit firms – including the big four – could soon be mandated
by law to separate their audit and consultancy outfits. The
government has initiated a discussion on whether it should amend
corporate law to mandate separation of the two arms to eliminate
conflict of interest. However, a final decision on the contentious
issue is pending as the government may not want the proposed
change in law to result in undue hardship for domestic audit
firms. Local consultancy and audit firms are small in size and
have to face severe competition; a harsh rule may be detrimental
to their growth, said a government source.
Observers say local
audit firms will be hit more because some of the global auditors-
PriceWaterhouseCoopers, KPMG and E&Y – have already begun
the process of separating their audit firms from the consulting
arm. This is mandated by the newly adopted Sarbannes Oxley Act,
which came into being in the US after accounting scams were
unearthed in companies like Enron, Worldcomm and others. Hence,
the global auditors are pretty much prepared for legal changes
in the Indian company law, said a source. The global auditors
essentially have a partnership firm with unlimited liability
conducting the audit functions. Another company with limited
liability runs the consulting business.
Go
to top
|
|
© 2001 Academy of Corporate Governance |
|