acg-logo
 
cg-journal-title
 
Vol 4: Issue No.11 : November, 2004
NATIONAL NEWS

Hony. Editor
Dr. Bindi Mehta
Professor & Chairperson (Research & Publications)
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
(Deemed University)






ej-barej-barej-barej-bar
ej-barej-barej-barej-bar
ej-barej-barej-barej-bar
ej-barej-barej-barej-bar
 
National Events
Audit reports to reveal company’s share capital too

Companies will soon have to disclose a lot more information to the income tax department. The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) will shortly raise the level of disclosures in the audit reports. Additional information like all money being invested in the business - i.e. share capital of the company – will have to be disclosed through audit reports, said a senior government official. Right now, companies only disclose loans and deposits raised during the year. The information will be used for picking up cases for scrutiny, which involves checking the veracity of information disclosed by the assessee. According to a senior partner of the auditing firm, loans and deposits give a limited picture of the total investments going into businesses as share application and public offers are the most prevalent mode for capital induction. Besides, existing TDS disclosures are only on delayed TDS.

Income tax rules are likely to be amended soon to incorporate additional disclosures. Senior government officials maintained that the idea was to have comprehensive information at one place. The income tax law mandated audit reports to be filed by chartered accountants for businesses where total sales turnover or gross receipts exceed Rs. 40 lakh in any previous year.


 






 
 
   
Finance ministry asks SEBI to speed up stock market reforms

The finance ministry has asked the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) to implement reform measures such as the corporatization of stock exchanges, creation of the IndoNext trading platform and conversion of clearing-houses into corporations on a priority basis.

SEBI is expected to fix a specific date for exchanges such as the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) to submit fresh schemes for demutualisation and corporatisation of these bourses. The maximum number of representatives of stock brokers on the recognised stock exchanges’ the governing board shall not exceed one-fourth of the total strength of the governing board, the ordinance says. Demutualisation, which seeks to segregate the ownership and management from the trading rights of the members of a stock exchange, has been pending for the past three years.

A proposal is already pending with SEBI from the BSE and the Federation of Indian Stock Exchanges (FISE), which represents the country’s 20 bourses, to from a national market called IndoNext on the lines of Europe’s EuroNext. The government also wanted the markets regulator to ensure that clearing houses of the stock exchanges be converted into clearing corporations.

At present, only the National Stock Exchange (NSE) has a clearing corporation. Most other exchanges, including the BSE, have clearing houses, which are entrusted with the task of clearing the trades on exchanges and provide counter party guarantee for those trading on exchanges.



Go to top

Breach of Companies Act may invite fine of up to Rs. 1 Crore

Getting away with corporate offences may not be too easy any more. The government has begun work to raise penalties for serious defaults to over Rs.1. crore. Penalties proposed in the draft concept paper on overhaul of the Companies Act are to be further revised, as per a ministry of company affairs proposal. The concept paper had proposed maximum penalties of Rs.10 lakh for serious offences like failure to pay declared dividends, redeem debentures or pay back deposits raised from investors.

In its present form, the Companies Act provides for nominal penalties, ranging from Rs.500 to Rs.5,000, which have failed to act as a deterrent. Errant companies have been paying maximum fines upfront for compounding of major offences. The ministry had placed the concept paper aimed at simplifying the Act, in the public domain for comments to be studied by an expert committee,

SEBI, under a new ordinance issued by the government, now has powers to penalise stock exchanges - such as slapping a fine of up to Rs.25 crore - it bourses fail to comply with SEBI’s directions. Till now, the only action SEBI could take against bourses for non-compliance of its directions was de-recognising the bourse, which is quite impractical.

Go to top


Failure to pay SEBI penalty may invite 10-yr. jail term

The government has just strengthened SEBI’s hands further by permitting the market regulator to impose a fine of up to Rs. 25 Crore if bourses do not follow its directions. The recently – issued Securities Laws (Amendment) Ordinance 2004, says that if a stock exchange fails or neglects to furnish periodical returns to SEBI, or fails to make or amend its rules or by-laws as directed by the regulator, SEBI can slap a penalty of up to Rs. 25 crore.

Last year, the government gave SEBI power to impose higher penalties, as part of its efforts to help the market regulator act decisively against wrongdoers. In addition to that, the government is now increasing SEBI’s penal powers and expanding its scope.

The ordinance also says that SEBI can slap a penalty of up to Rs. 25 crore on companies that dematerialise more than the issued securities or deliver in the stock exchanges securities that are not listed or where no trading permission has been given by the stock exchange. It adds that failure to pay the penalty imposed by SEBI could lead to imprisonment for up to 10 years

Go to top

CalPERS gets going, pumps in $100m here

The California Public Employee’s Retirement System (CalPERS), the largest pension fund in the US, has invested over US $100 million in the domestic market since April 2004. The fund, which made an entry into the country early this year, has made investments in the pharma, manufacturing and IT sectors. It has also invested another US $10-15 million by way of private equity investment. “We have made over $100m investment in the Indian markets,” said Priya Mathur, Vice Chairperson, investment committee trustee CalPERS, who is currently in India. She did not comment on how much more CalPERS is likely to bring into India this year. The fund has invested close to US $ 2 billion in emerging markets last year. “We have three emerging market fund managers who make the investment decision. If they find an opportunity, they will invest.”

“We are looking at investing in local corporate debt if the market develops, but it is an immature market right now,” she said. The daily volumes in the Indian corporate debt market average about Rs.100 crore.


Go to top

Local audit firms may have to separate consultancy business

All Indian audit firms – including the big four – could soon be mandated by law to separate their audit and consultancy outfits. The government has initiated a discussion on whether it should amend corporate law to mandate separation of the two arms to eliminate conflict of interest. However, a final decision on the contentious issue is pending as the government may not want the proposed change in law to result in undue hardship for domestic audit firms. Local consultancy and audit firms are small in size and have to face severe competition; a harsh rule may be detrimental to their growth, said a government source.

Observers say local audit firms will be hit more because some of the global auditors- PriceWaterhouseCoopers, KPMG and E&Y – have already begun the process of separating their audit firms from the consulting arm. This is mandated by the newly adopted Sarbannes Oxley Act, which came into being in the US after accounting scams were unearthed in companies like Enron, Worldcomm and others. Hence, the global auditors are pretty much prepared for legal changes in the Indian company law, said a source. The global auditors essentially have a partnership firm with unlimited liability conducting the audit functions. Another company with limited liability runs the consulting business.

Go to top

 

 

© 2001 Academy of Corporate Governance