 |
|
|
|
|
Vol
4: Issue No.9 : September, 2004 |
|
| Hony.
Editor |
| Dr.
Bindi Mehta
Professor
& Chairperson (Research & Publications)
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies
(Deemed University) |
|
   
   
   
    |
|
| International
Events |
| UK
corporate governance bill to cost millions
|
UK
government plans to improve corporate
governance will cost companies millions,
a UK technology analyst firm claims.
The Butler Group says that firms will
have to spend heavily to ensure that
there computer systems comply with
the Companies (Audit, Investigations
and Community Enterprise) Bill. This
Bill is the UK equivalent of the US's
Sarbanes-Oxley Act and it addresses
shortcomings highlighted by auditing
scandals such as Shell, Parmalat and
Enron. In essence, it deals with accounting
practices, with particular attention
paid to auditing processes.
Mike Davis, senior research analyst
at Butler Group, said: "While
the UK has always had better auditing
standards than the US, the Companies
Bill tightens these up still further.
However, as with Sarbanes-Oxley, the
only efficient and cost-effective
way for UK businesses to meet the
Companies Bill requirements will be
through the investment in certain
key technologies. Failure to make
these investments quickly and correctly
will leave UK businesses prone to
severe financial penalties."
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Disclosure
and director independence are
wanting, report says
|
Hong
Kong Standards of disclosure by Hong Kong companies and
the independence of their directors are low, Standard &
Poor's said Tuesday, the second report in a week criticizing
corporate governance in a city where more than 1,000 companies
are listed.
Hong
Kong ranked third in corporate governance behind Singapore
and Malaysia, according to a study of five Asian economies
by the credit rating company and the National University
of Singapore.
The
city ranked ahead of Thailand and Indonesia.
"The
data from the study showed that independence of the boards
of directors for most companies on the Hang Seng index is
very low," said Mak Yuen Teen, vice dean of the National
University of Singapore's Business School, which co-wrote
the study with Standard Poor's.
CLSA
and the Asian Corporate Governance Association last week
said that stock market regulators have to do more to improve
disclosure, increase the independence of directors and strengthen
enforcement of rules.
BOC
Hong Kong (Holdings), CLP Holdings, COSCO Pacific, HSBC
Holdings, and Li Fung ranked as the top-five listed companies
in Hong Kong in terms of corporate governance, Standard
Poor's said. HSBC and CLP also featured in the CLSA report.
Still,
the top-ranking companies in Hong Kong also need to increase
the number of independent directors on their boards and
independent audit committees.
Some
companies have hired outside directors.
Johnson
Electric Holdings said Monday that it had hired Laura Cha,
previously a vice chairwoman of the China Securities Regulatory
Commission, as an independent director and member of its
audit board.
BOC
Hong Kong hired several independent directors, including
Linda Tsao Yang, a former executive director of the Asian
Development Bank, after it was criticized for lack of disclosure
about the departure of its chief executive, Liu Jinbao,
in May 2003.
"Most
of the corporate governance scores" in Hong Kong "appear
to be clustered between 11 and 40 points, out of a maximum
of 140," said Calvin Wong, managing director of Standard
Poor's Governance Services.
More
mainland Chinese companies - including BOC Hong Kong, Ping
An Insurance and Semiconductor Manufacturing International
- are now listing shares in Hong Kong, raising investors'
concerns about transparency and corruption.
In the
past two years, Euro-Asia Agricultural Holdings, a China-based
orchid grower, was delisted in Hong Kong after its founder,
Yang Bin, was sentenced in China to 18 years in prison for
fraud, and Zhou Zhengyi, the chairman of Shanghai Land Holdings,
a mainland property developer, was jailed for three years
for stock market fraud and falsifying documents.
"Where
all markets fall down is in enforcement," Jamie Allen,
secretary general of the Asian Corporate Governance Association,
said last week.
"A
large number of rules are brought out, but there isn't a
similar investment in the people or structure to enforce
them," he added.
Go
to top
|
| E&Y
advises investment in corporate governance |
Beijing,
Sept. 27 (Xinhuanet) -- Chinese financial companies need to
invest heavily in long-neglected areas such as corporate governance
and risk management to secure success for planned stock offerings,
advises accounting firm Ernst & Young (E&Y).
China's financial reform is standing at a critical juncture
as it is only a little more than two years away from opening
up fully the local market to foreign investors under World
Trade Organization commitments, China Daily reported Monday.
Three leading domestic insurers were listed on the Hong Kong
stock exchange last year, and the China Construction Bank
and Bank of China, two of the four largest State-owned lenders,
are planning initial public offerings (IPOs) as early as next
year.
"Their success is of great significance to China's development,"
said Raymond Woo, chairman of China Operating Committee at
E&Y.
But many preparations need to be made before the companies
go ahead with their listing plans.
"Historical baggage must be unloaded first," Woo
said.
Chinese insurance companies need to resolve the burden of
policies written in high interest-rate years that resulted
in huge losses after a string of interest rate cuts, The banks
will also have to settle problems of huge non-performing loans
and low capital adequacy, he said.
An important task, Woo said, is to bring corporate governance,
risk management and information disclosure practices up to
international levels to secure investor confidence.
"The cost can be high," he said. "But if you
don't do it, how can you improve competitiveness?"
Insufficient investment
China's financial companies are relatively newcomers to the
global capital market and have been frustrated by what analysts
say are symptoms of maladjustment.
China Life Insurance Co Ltd, the second domestic financial
firm to list overseas, was embroiled in an accounting scandal
after its hugely-oversubscribed IPO at the end of last year.
And last month, only two months after its IPO in Hong Kong,
Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of China, Ltd found itself
in the headlines with its public relations agency prematurely
releasing half-year results.
One reason for the difficulties, analysts say, is widespread
reluctance of many Chinese companies to outlay money on corporate
governance and risk management, instead eagerly pursuing profits.
It needs to be corrected. "Companies need to know their
risk preferences before they set out their business strategies,"
Woo said.
"Profit is important but some risks can erode profitability,"
he said, adding risks in areas such as reputation, product
innovation and compliance threaten to weigh on businesses'
key earnings drivers.
"If risk management is only seen as a cost rather than
a strategy, it's a problem," Woo said.
Chinese authorities have issued regulations, which analysts
say are close to international standards, in areas such as
corporate governance and risk management, but it will take
time for them to be incorporated into the system.
China's still developing market economy mechanisms are hardly
enough to guarantee the immediate effect of such measures,
Woo said, citing the disproportionately large share of retail
investors in the domestic stock market.
(China Daily)
Go
to top
|
| Company’s
earnings rise with good governance |
|
Corporations that are rated highest for governance
practices have delivered superior investment returns, according
to result of a new study released recently by Governance Metrics
International (GMI). GMI has said in its latest data on 2,588
global companies found that 26 companies receiving the highest
score of 10 out-performed the Standard & Poor’s 500 stock
index total return by 10 % over the past five years. Over a
three-year period, the companies outperformed by 8.3 % and over
one year they outperformed by 4.9 %. The 26 companies included
20 American companies, five Canadian and one Australian company.
GMI said the companies also outperformed when measured against
the Morgan Stanley Capital International World Index.
“This
suggests a correlation between corporate governance practices
and portfolio returns when measured across a number of variables
and across a multi-year period”, GMI chief executive Gavin Anderson
said in a statement. He said that US companies as a group had
improved ratings over the past two years, with the average rating
rising to 7.2 from 6.5. He attributed the better showing in
part to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, a US law that required a series
of accounting and corporate governance reforms.
The
report said that 95 % of US companies now say they have a qualified
financial expert on their audit committee, compared with 65
% in an earlier study in 2002. Nearly three quarters have hiring
policies concerning employees of former employees of auditor
firms, compared with only 14 % in 2002. Just over half of the
companies have adopted a policy on rotation of audit personnel,
compared with 8 % in 2002.
Majority
of audit committees, 83 % now perform self-evaluations, compared
with 17 % in the earlier study. In other changes, 90 % of companies
now have board evaluation policies, as compared to 35 % in 2002.
Director training is being provided by 80 % of companies compared
with 14 % in the earlier study.
Go
to top
|
|